aliases:
- Galileo gambit
- Guilt by association
- Guilty by association
- Honor by association
tags:
- Type/Concept
- proto
from:
related:
contra:
to:
dateCreated: 2022-09-19, 17:54
dateModified: 2023-12-08, 08:58
version: 1
publish: true
The association fallacy is a formal logical fallacy that asserts that properties of one thing must also be properties of another thing, if both things belong to the same group. For example, a fallacious arguer may claim that "bears are animals, and bears are dangerous; therefore your dog, which is also an animal, must be dangerous." | |
---|---|
wikipedia:: Association fallacy |
The association fallacy is a formal logical fallacy that asserts that properties of one thing must also be properties of another thing, if both things belong to the same group. For example, a fallacious arguer may claim that "bears are animals, and bears are dangerous; therefore your dog, which is also an animal, must be dangerous."
When it is an attempt to win favor by exploiting the audience's preexisting spite or disdain for something else, it is called guilt by association or an appeal to spite (Latin: argumentum ad odium). Guilt by association is similar to ad hominem arguments which attack the speaker rather than addressing the claims, but in this case the ill feeling is not created by the argument; it already exists.
an informal Inductive Fallacy of the Faulty (Hasty) Generalization or Red Herring type and which asserts, by irrelevant association and often by Appeal to emotion that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities of another. Two types of association fallacies are sometimes referred to as guilt by association and honor by association.