aliases:
tags:
- Type/Concept
- proto
from:
- "[[Anthropology]]"
related:
- "[[Diversity]]"
- "[[Racism]]"
contra:
to:
dateCreated: 2023-10-29, 09:39
dateModified: 2023-10-29, 10:24
version: 1
publish: true
An Ethnicity or ethnic group is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. Those attributes can include a common nation of origin, or common sets of ancestry, traditions, language, history, society, religion, or social treatment. The term ethnicity is often used interchangeably with the term nation, particularly in cases of ethnic nationalism. | |
---|---|
wikipedia:: Ethnicity |
An Ethnicity or ethnic group is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. Those attributes can include a common nation of origin, or common sets of ancestry, traditions, language, history, society, religion, or social treatment. The term ethnicity is often used interchangeably with the term nation, particularly in cases of ethnic nationalism.
Ethnicity may be construed as an inherited or societally imposed construct. Ethnic membership tends to be defined by a shared cultural heritage, ancestry, origin myth, history, homeland, language, dialect, religion, mythology, folklore, ritual, cuisine, dressing style, art, or physical appearance. Ethnic groups may share a narrow or broad spectrum of genetic ancestry, depending on group identification, with many groups having mixed genetic ancestry.By way of language shift, acculturation, adoption, and religious conversion, individuals or groups may over time shift from one ethnic group to another. Ethnic groups may be divided into subgroups or tribes, which over time may become separate ethnic groups themselves due to endogamy or physical isolation from the parent group. Conversely, formerly separate ethnicities can merge to form a pan-ethnicity and may eventually merge into one single ethnicity. Whether through division or amalgamation, the formation of a separate ethnic identity is referred to as ethnogenesis.
Although both organic and performative criteria characterise ethnic groups, debate in the past has dichotomised between primordialism and constructivism. Earlier 20th-century "Primordialists" viewed ethnic groups as real phenomena whose distinct characteristics have endured since the distant past. Perspectives that developed after the 1960s increasingly viewed ethnic groups as social constructs, with identity assigned by societal rules.
Might be based on sharing a common Identity, nationality, Language, Culture, History, Religion, etc. but while it used to usually imply racial or genetic identity, it is evolving to not entail that.
In 1950, the UNESCO statement "The Race Question", signed by some of the internationally renowned scholars of the time (including Ashley Montagu, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Gunnar Myrdal, Julian Huxley, etc.), said:
National, religious, geographic, linguistic and cultural groups do not necessarily coincide with racial groups: and the cultural traits of such groups have no demonstrated genetic connection with racial traits. Because serious errors of this kind are habitually committed when the term "race" is used in popular parlance, it would be better when speaking of human races to drop the term "race" altogether and speak of "ethnic groups"
#form/thought So, in general, use ethnicity or ethnic group instead of race, since race in reference to physical/genetic traits since correlation between genetics and cultural/behavioral characteristics are so weak. And ethnicity in general, by common usage is almost always referring to something cultural, behavioral, customary, etc. and thus to use ethnicity as if it also entails some physical/genetic trait/cause is thus likely to be false, or racist at worst. The genetic differences, in general, tend to be relatively arbitrary - skin color, etc. Even height, once thought to be largely genetic has shown to be extremely/almost entirely explained by childhood nutrition, e.g. The strongest case for identity and ethnicity as genetic/race that I know of are genetic rates of diseases like skin cancer or sickle cell anemia. But why would those be part of one's identity? Or, from another angle, there may be differential rates of a given trait between groups. But in those cases the differences within that group are almost always greater than between other groups. Ie, genetic trait x within group y might be frequency z. But when you compare the relative differences between that group's supposedly essential genetic trait x and other groups, the difference between the supposedly genetically/essentially different groups are < frequency z. Ie, the difference between the groups is less than the difference within each group, making essentializing, differentiating, othering people via genetic traits very weak/meaningless/not scientific. Ie, racism is not just ethically wrong, but false and dumb. I'm not sure if any of this conflicts with The Bell Curve book...