aliases:
tags: Type/Concept,proto,wikipedia
publish: true
version: 1.0
dateCreated: 2023-09-08, 14:48
dateModified: 2024-08-04, 09:48
from: ["[[English Language]]"]
related: []
contra: []
to: []
In linguistics, the Grammar of a natural language is its set of structural rules on speakers' or writers' usage and creation of clauses, phrases, and words. The term can also refer to the study of such rules, a subject that includes phonology, morphology, and syntax, together with phonetics, semantics, and pragmatics. There are, broadly speaking, two different ways to study grammar: traditional grammar and theoretical grammar. | |
---|---|
wikipedia:: Grammar |
Syntax
Semantic
Meaning vs use (Wittgenstein)
Syntactic ambiguity
Semantic ambiguity
Morphology, morpheme
Prescriptive Grammar vs Descriptivism
literal vs figurative
diphthong
Elements of Style by Strunk and White
Inflection
loan words
borrowed words
Linguists recognize that the above list of eight or nine word classes is drastically simplified.[17] For example, "adverb" is to some extent a catch-all class that includes words with many different functions. Some have even argued that the most basic of category distinctions, that of nouns and verbs, is unfounded,[18] or not applicable to certain languages.[19][20] Modern linguists have proposed many different schemes whereby the words of English or other languages are placed into more specific categories and subcategories based on a more precise understanding of their grammatical functions.
Traditional classification vs functional classification of parts of speech
Open vs closed
function word vs content word
prefix
suffix
Counterfactual (contrafactual)
It is now generally agreed that a sentence may begin with a coordinating conjunction like and,[20] but,[21] or yet.[22] While some people consider this usage improper, Follett's Modern American Usage labels its prohibition a "supposed rule without foundation" and a "prejudice [that] lingers from a bygone time."[23]
Some associate this belief with their early school days. One conjecture is that it results from young children's being taught to avoid simple sentences starting with and and are encouraged to use more complex structures with subordinating conjunctions.[20] In the words of Bryan A. Garner, the "widespread belief ... that it is an error to begin a sentence with a conjunction such as and, but, or so has no historical or grammatical foundation",[24] and good writers have frequently started sentences with conjunctions.[23]
There is also a misleading guideline that a sentence should never begin with because. Because is a subordinating conjunction, and introduces a dependent clause. It may start a sentence when the main clause follows the dependent clause.[25]